Laymans Terms:
iamfscked: i proved mathmatically the strangest theorm to date
streetchic222: oh yeah?
iamfscked: you can under stand it too
streetchic222: what is it ?
streetchic222: i doubt that
iamfscked: it bridges the concept between love and math
streetchic222: oh sounds like...your proving something
iamfscked: i did
iamfscked: i made the board game of LOVE
iamfscked: oddly enough it works out in quantum physics
iamfscked: go figure
streetchic222: well your smart like that
iamfscked: but i can explain you the concept
iamfscked: easily
iamfscked: take for example you right now
iamfscked: you aren't sexually promiscious
iamfscked: now you are playing a different game that you were playing before
iamfscked: i am not trying to insult you
iamfscked: i took a basic concept of love
streetchic222: yeah okay
iamfscked: and generalized it to a game
iamfscked: before you were a transient lover
iamfscked: but now
iamfscked: you are a selective one
streetchic222: now im not dating at all
iamfscked: well
iamfscked: then you are unobtainable
iamfscked: so we have three kinds of lovers the promiscious , the true one and the unobtainable
iamfscked: now
streetchic222: yes
iamfscked: take that and apply the same thing to stupid men
iamfscked: oh yea
iamfscked: it also proves that all men orignaly were designed to be stupid
iamfscked:
iamfscked: but you already knew that
streetchic222: not all men are stupid
iamfscked: no
iamfscked: all men are initally not very smart
iamfscked: they need to train their language functions more
iamfscked: thats all
streetchic222: yeah
Funky Math crap:
Abstract:
What happens if you want a chick to fall for you? You try to mimic her interests and then you try to get into her head. Now this is technically Fouier analysis of a another human being having a communication channel of 3 and 1/2 dimentions. This is a informal email proof that might prove it. I don't know how to setup TeX and stuff and I have to learn this. I am a 15 year old studing Geometry at Downers Grove South Highschool

Proof of harmonic Functions Over 4(Possiblly N) dimentions
Basically take a game of chess. You take that game of chess and play it out right? A requirement of the game is that you need checkmate to win. SO YOU NEED AT LEAST TWO PIECES TO GET MATE. This is very important later in the explaination.
Next take all of that physics stuff that you lear/n/ed in school and apply it to the chess board.
(Einsteins Field Equasions / Electric field equasions etc.....)
Now take the game of chess and put the king with a ring of pawns around it. Take the two knights and put that on the higher chess board. Take the 2 Bishops and put it on the next higher chess board
Each Level of the chess board represents a energy level in physics.
Now here is the tricky part how to win every single GAME. Take the function Intragal( limit at Z and negative Z (Summation to infinity with iterated variables at N and A ((D^n)a Over (dt^2)dz over dt) and graph it on a really fast moby like for example a computer near me (Argonne National Lab's Computer). You can use this function to find patterns that will win the game ( that have definite solutions) or that have unpredictable solutions.
Now Here is the part i forgot to put on slashdot. Well Take the Continuious function and it shows patterns in N dimentions. To solve the game all you have to do is take all of the vectors in the game give them a vector and execute that function generalized to that vector. The only disproof of the theorm is the nonexistance of the game and since I just proved that the game exists I can Formally call it a proof. Also You have a something called a Nash equilibrium Point ( Whatever that is????) in the middle of the board and the geometry of the board has hyperbolic curvature.
Now the last part. If you take this game and make the vectors totally random you can generalize it to the game of LOVE. Take two people with knowledge vectors of Z where z equals yi plus X and then iterate the function. This is why people fade / fade out of love and when 2 people are isolated in a island then they start to fall in love etc.... You could apply this to something called the stock market and make a killing ( look out for the fifalde general market fund)

You can Graph this On music also. Actually its ONLY graphable in real time with music which is strange so i attached a musical graph



jfnj@math.princeton.edu Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 <jfnj@math.princeton.edu>... User unknown

Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;Norton_AntiVirus_Gateways@math.Princeton.EDU
Final-Recipient: rfc822;jfnj@math.princeton.edu
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user (jfnj@math.princeton.edu).
From: joshua herman <r2q2@attbi.com>
Date: Mon Feb 24, 2003 01:25:52 AM Etc/GMT
To: ian@locut.us, paulos@math.temple.edu, letters@2600.com, spot@draves.org, milesgrp@princeton.edu, jfnj@math.princeton.edu
Subject: part 5 Proof 2

There is a statistic where a certain group of people take scihophrenia and "beat" it so to speak. This statistic is very low but the numbers really aren't important. Whats important is how they could do this???? Scziophrenia is basically a random alteration function over a network of neurons. Lets take this and generalize it into a wave function. What John Nash proved accidentally was that given this network you can beat this wave function by finding a wave function that cancels out it. The wave function that JFNJ was thought and some drugs early in his life SO i propose the JFNJ proof which states.
If John Forbes Nash Exists then my Blue Rose Conjecture is true.
Because if John forbes nash didn't exist and NO ONE COULD BEAT SCHIZOPHRENIA.
This is the hardest proof I have done so far because I have to meet John Forbes Nash to prove it ;-)
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 01:34 AM, Bryan Donlan wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 24 February 2003 08:15 pm, joshua herman wrote:
Well freenet is really a bunch of vectors. This proves that a network
designed with harmonic relationships over 4 or higher dimentions are
theoretically more realistic and can be more fault tolerant. The only
thing stopping it is the software. Humorously if you take any of Bach's
works like his inventions and start iterating it then you connect all of
the points you get a field that has nash equlibrium points all over the
place. When this occurs a general Nash equlibrium point is established
in the middle of the node.

Oh. I don't understand a word of it, but I guess someone else might get the
connection.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Wsg+x533NjVSos4RAvEOAKCLq7NsQy5F+8InB8umUrluKo0qdwCeKEsj
642jNjUT4zg+x1NiW/9LslI=
=UwQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: joshua herman <r2q2@attbi.com>
Date: Mon Feb 24, 2003 12:29:24 PM Etc/GMT
To: webmaster+4@rec-puzzles.org, webmaster@rec-puzzles.org
Subject: A proof of the Jude's Rose Conjecture ( Conjecture formerly known as Blue Rose Conjecture)

There is a statistic where a certain group of people take scihophrenia and "beat" it so to speak. This statistic is very low but the numbers really aren't important. Whats important is how they could do this???? Scziophrenia is basically a random alteration function over a network of neurons. Lets take this and generalize it into a wave function. What John Nash proved accidentally was that given this network you can beat this wave function by finding a wave function that cancels it out. The wave function that JFNJ was thought and some drugs early in his life SO i propose the JFNJ proof which states.
If John Forbes Nash Exists then my Jude's Rose Conjecture is true.
Because if John forbes nash didn't exist therefore NO ONE COULD BEAT SCHIZOPHRENIA. This is the hardest proof I have done so far because I have to meet John Forbes Nash to prove it ;-). Oddly enough I think there is a Nash Equilibrium point of which John F. Nash Reached himself. Technically he is a walking talking proof of his own thingy too. You have to take the nash equlibrium point and graph it algebraically which I believe Nash did and to find it in any equasion just find the point of most harmony
Now take this function and you can find all of the Zero's of the Riemann Hypothesis by analysing the all of the zero's for n-dimentional chords. I am checking the correctness of the proof to see if I should do more research on it. I am only a 15 year old recreational mathematician and I have better things to do like get my grades up and stuff if its totaly wrong.
oh yea
http://1946875.tripod.com is my website
(watch a yugi get hit by a semi hehehe)