William Gibson Books    www.williamgibsonboard.com    www.williamgibsonboard.com  Hop To Forum Categories  PATTERN RECOGNITION    An Object From The Other Side Of The Bridge

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Jaunter
Posted
Something Gibson wrote in his blog recently caught my attention, and seemed to evoke a common theme amongst his work that has so far been hiding from me.

"I love this jacket. It reminds me of the title of a Surrealist sculpture, "An Object From The Other Side Of The Bridge". It's real, but it emerged from a work of fiction. "

Fiction influencing reality, like Cayce getting together with Parkaboy, or Mama Anarchia turning out to be Dorotea, or Cyberspace frying your physical brain. Some other world, the internet of fiction or any other mirror of reality, directly altering the "dominant" reality.

If you look at Gibson's earlier work (Sprawl trilogy), he's much less optimistic of the affects of this cross-reality influence. In it, digital gods swallow you up, thieves use it to thieve, etc. But now, with Pattern Recognition (and also the Bridge trilogy, with the Idoru manifesting herself into reality), he seems to be much more up-beat about this influence. The internet is a good thing in PR: Cayce finds love over it, and she cracks the case using it. While I'm not saying Cyberspace was portrayed as immoral or negative or whatever, I'm saying that Gibson has definitely become much more positive concerning the affects of some sort of unseen global-communication, or mirror-world influencing reality. He seems pretty happy about the Buzz Rickson thing, doesn't he? That he's influenced reality through his fiction, just like he influenced it with cyberpunk, and has imbedded our culture with unreal ideas.

Hm. Did any of that make any sense?
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Kingston, Ontario | Registered: January 21, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of L_Han
Posted Hide Post
i agree about the upbeat attitude part.. the part i do not agree is that when the sprawl and bridge trilogies was written (as colin kindly reminded me- about 18 years ago now) it was mere fiction and unreal- not so these days... It gives people an outlet from depression and as demonstrated in PR makes it possible for people who have no other means of communicating their feelings and ideas- share them and even influence masses with them... I do not see the future of the virtual world as dark as it was portrayed in the initial cyberpunk culture anymore...that is the sense i make out of it...
 
Posts: 841 | Location: ITHACA,NY | Registered: January 26, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of nilcypher
Posted Hide Post
L_Han beat me to it. I was going to say the exact same thing.

Your references to Pattern Recognition and the internet intrigued me though. While you mention the positive things that happen, you seem to have totally skipped over the negative parts.

It was thanks to the internet that Cayce finds out that Damien's apartment had been broken into and it was the internet that allowed Dorathea to spy on Cayce. Pattern Recognition shows the internet for what it is, a tool. A tool isn't, and can't be, a moral or immoral thing. It's the uses that people put it that colour our perceptions.



A blog that I actually update! www.pickledunicorn.com - for all your gaming needs.
 
Posts: 1811 | Registered: November 14, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jaunter
Posted Hide Post
Well, that's exactly what Gibson says in interviews and such, but really, it's difficult to avoid some sort of slant. While the internet is portrayed as a source of a lot of bad things, ultimately, Cayce saves the day and falls in love through it. The internet becomes more real than reality, in many ways, or at least manifests into the world. Here's a quote from PR:

"She looks at the phone and wonders who Parkaboy is. Other, that is, than Parkaboy, ascerbic obsessive theorist of the footage. What does he do when he's not doing this? She has no idea, and no idea what he looks like or, really, how he came to be as devoted as she knows he is to pursuing any further understanding of the footage. But now, in some way she can't quite grasp, the universe of F:F:F is averting. Manifesting physically into the world. Darryl Musashi's pissed-off Japanese-Texan barmaid seems to be an aspect of this."

Damn. Sorry, but right when I finished copying that out, I lost the page.

Cyberspace, in Gibson's earlier work, was a tool used by bad people. The internet, in his newer work, is still a tool, but is also presented in a much more optimistic light, a tool that isn't used for the kind of badness cyberspace was used for. In PR, the footage is the main aspect of the net. In the Sprawl, cyberspace is for thievery. While they aren't limitted to these things, in his earlier novels, the internet's main purpose is negative in nature, and in his later works, its purpose is more positive.

I guess the purpose of me trying to argue this is to trace the development of Gibson's perception of technology through his writing, while following a common theme that has lasted throughout all of his work. While technology doesn't stop being a neutral tool, Gibson has slowly begun to portray humans in a more optimistic light, at least in terms of what they do with this stuff.
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Kingston, Ontario | Registered: January 21, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of ArkanGL
Online Status For 33024673
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Cyberspace, in Gibson's earlier work, was a tool used by bad people.


As is the case now...

His earlier works focused on more shady characters.
But it doesn't mean that nobody good used Cyberspace.


_____________________________
Albert's path is a strange and difficult one.
 
Posts: 19269 | Location: Republic of Heaven | Registered: March 10, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Sentinel400
Posted Hide Post
The point of this particular tool is that it allows you to extend yourself beyond your usual barriers. Those who seek to USE things are always going to have a much greater impact than those who just want to look around and see what's there.
If it wasn't for porn, would we have such efficient content delivery and secure money transeferring facilities now? I doubt it.
 
Posts: 3940 | Location: WGB Revenge Squad | Registered: January 25, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of misty
Posted Hide Post
quote:
In the Sprawl, cyberspace is for thievery. While they aren't limitted to these things, in his earlier novels, the internet's main purpose is negative in nature, and in his later works, its purpose is more positive.


but there's "when it changed". in the short stories and neuromancer it seems it's all about thievery, but even during the neuromancer period the AIs are taking it somewhere else.
 
Posts: 9999 | Location: rockdale | Registered: September 10, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jaunter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
While technology doesn't stop being a neutral tool, Gibson has slowly begun to portray humans in a more optimistic light, at least in terms of what they do with this stuff.
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Kingston, Ontario | Registered: January 21, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of L_Han
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jaunter:
In PR, the footage is the main aspect of the net.

That is exactly what i mean.. everything revolves around the footage in the PR - and oh boy there is alot connected to it
I think the main point is anonymity
I mean these days you can stil use the net and still stay anonymous(i know i know- just to some extent). In WGs earlier works the net was displayed as a battleground where you have to fight very hard to hide something and they can still get you how hard you try... That seems to be the connection to me. I mean, Case manages to complete the mission and Neuromancer and Wintermute merges at the end- like wise Cayce cracks the case and figures out where the footage is coming from against all obstacles thrown her way... Case cracks the ice with the help of the Dixie flatline- a virtual ally, Cayce figures out the mistery of the footage with the help of other virtual friends like Parkaboy...
I guess i am rambling..anyhow, point being- i don't really see a change in WGs description of the world, its just a change in people's attitudes about it...
 
Posts: 841 | Location: ITHACA,NY | Registered: January 26, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jaunter
Posted Hide Post
He must've developed, somehow. I mean, he wrote Neuromancer how long ago?
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Kingston, Ontario | Registered: January 21, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of misty
Posted Hide Post
how dare he!
 
Posts: 9999 | Location: rockdale | Registered: September 10, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jaunter
Posted Hide Post
Hm. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that someone's outlook on life would develop over a period of two decades.

Misty, you fail at human endeavor!
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Kingston, Ontario | Registered: January 21, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of misty
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Misty, you fail at human endeavor!


with glee!
 
Posts: 9999 | Location: rockdale | Registered: September 10, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of subject
Posted Hide Post
to agree with several previous posters, yeah, the focus has certainly changed, but i think the perception of the net is only secondary. the sprawl series is full of RPG characters, not people. PR comes a step closer to "ordinary" folks (even if they have extraordinary characteristics) than the Bridge trilogy, which was already several steps closer than the sprawl. that changes the entire world view of the book. has his perception of people changed since he wrote the sprawl series? i would freaking hope so.

from 1993 interview, posted by sentinel:

quote:
MR: In Neuromancer they were modulated by the need for access, to jack. The same as a Burroughs character has this need for junk. And yet the desires of the characters in Virtual Light seem to have become more multifaceted, obfuscated as you go on. I mean, Rydell doesn't know what he's looking for. He just... He seems to want to... Well, I don't know, you'd know him better than I do. And Chevette just always seems to want to get away. So do you feel that that's to do with yourself becoming more financially secure?

WG: No.

MR: Or older?

WG: Yeah, I think it was an attempt to... Oh I don't know, in some ways as I get older I feel more desperate. I think it has more to do with an attempt at literary naturalism and I honestly think that Chevelle and Rydette... ... Rydell and Chevette... I think that Chevette and Rydell are more like most people than most people are like those console cowboys and razor girls in Neuromancer. No, I don't think those people really know What They Want, in capital letters, beyond just getting by. It strikes me that most people will... are just getting by.
One thing that those two want is to have a job. They want to make a living and they don't have real good jobs and their jobs are very important to them. And that's very different from Neuromancer. That's a much more naturalistic take on human existence than anything in Neuromancer.
The only character in Virtual Light that is anything like a character from the previous three novels is Loveless the Psychopath, the sadistic psychopathic killer. And he's... One of the inside jokes with me in the book is that Loveless is this guy who if he appeared in Count Zero would just be part of the wallpaper. Turner would kill him, stuff him under a Volkswagen and go have a cappuccino and not even think about it, but in Virtual Light he's this over the top crazy monstrous thing who's almost unbelievable. He's meant to teeter precariously on the edge of the ridiculous. So I had him in as being like the... he's the only character in the book who's like a character from Neuromancer, the only semi-major character.
And the rest... the rest of the major characters, they're drawn a different way, you know, and I like to feel that they're quite a bit less cartoony. They have character. They have parents and... shifting inner monologue. All of it, you know? I was sort of trying to do naturalism there. But I don't know what they'll make of that on the Net.
If I could send them a message... If Mister Gibson could send a message to the boys on the Internet I'd tell them to go and get a dictionary and look up the word 'irony'.


...
 
Posts: 486 | Location: Location: Location: | Registered: December 22, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Closed Topic Closed

William Gibson Books    www.williamgibsonboard.com    www.williamgibsonboard.com  Hop To Forum Categories  PATTERN RECOGNITION    An Object From The Other Side Of The Bridge

© Copyright 2005, AuthorsOnTheWeb.com