quote:

Stuff like that doesn't make Assange seem more likely to commit rape. It makes him seem unstable, and that makes him more likely to do anything at all.

Thing is: when one does certain things he'd better not to do other things. Like, when one mess governments he must refrain from putting himself in morally reproachful situation.

Clinton learned that the hard way. Now Assange just did the same. The only piece lacking is a sperm embedded skirt... or condom...

There'll be that and more. It's why he's fighting extradition.

quote:

Stuff like that doesn't make Assange seem more likely to commit rape. It makes him seem unstable, and that makes him more likely to do anything at all.

This unstable?

quote:

Originally posted by Boogerhead:
It is looking more and more like the rape charges were fabricated because there is absolutley NO LINK WHATSOEVER between Assange and Manning. The only thing they could use to imprison him are the rape charges.

Come on Boog. Think about what you're saying there. Unless that's sarcasm.

The US Government didn't charge him with rape.

Like, something bad happened to me so it must be the workings of my enemy. My barley crop was low this year, so my neighbor is a witch.

Yeah, not serious there... Tongue firmly in cheek...

quote:

My barley crop was low this year, so my neighbor is a witch.

BRN THE WITCH!

quote:

Originally posted by Boogerhead:
Yeah, not serious there... Tongue firmly in cheek...

Please forgive me.

I've seen the exact argument thrown down seriously.

I thought I'd linked it back to one such article, complete with commentary, but apparently my internet skills need some polishing.

It's not a closed process to protect Assange's identity, but it well could be. That's why it's closed, anyway.

Of course, Assange's lawyers will say it's the motherfucking CIA.

The prosecution and the court should get everyone's consent to OPEN it. THEN listen to Assange's camp scream bloody murder.

BofA is a powerful enemy to have made.

The light is creeping into this .. .. .. I mean, here's this behemoth, this bank that's "too big to fail", that's activly hounding media and reporters over their coverge of legitimate news because they don't like what they're reporting.

Fascism?

Please, friends, boycottBofA. To not do so is to become an enemy of truth, reason and equality.

[

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Boogerhead,

Yeah, BofA actually comes across as more disgusting than Assange.

Dumb move.

When you threaten to show the world where the richest 1% have hidden their wealth, they are bound to strike at you. This is only the most obvious shot they've fired. I honestly wonder about the ones that haven't been brought to light yet.

Perhaps bribing a certain Swedish official...

Julia Gillard is kind of annoying, eh?