www.williamgibsonboard.com
www.williamgibsonboard.com
News of the day & Current Issues
Neurobiology News|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
Member![]() |
Yes, there's a real rhythm to conversation, both gesturally and verbally. Have you noticed that people will generally respond to a greeting with an echo of the same greeting (wave, 'hi', 'good morning', etc.)? Sort of like a 'handshaking protocol' to get the conversation flowing properly or something... Re: how children acquire language: A Study of Multimodal Motherese: The Role of Temporal Synchrony between Verbal Labels and Gestures This study examined European American and Hispanic American mothers' multimodal communication to their infants (N = 24). The infants were from three age groups representing three levels of lexical-mapping development: prelexical (5 to 8 months), early-lexical (9 to 17 months), and advanced-lexical (21 to 30 months). Mothers taught their infants four target (novel) words by using distinct objects during a semistructured play episode. Recent research suggests that young infants rely on temporal synchrony to learn syllable–object relations, but later, the role of synchrony diminishes. Thus, mothers' target and nontarget naming were coded for synchrony and other communication styles. The results indicated that mothers used target words more often than nontarget words in synchrony with object motion and sometimes touch. Thus, ‘multimodal motherese’ likely highlights target word-referent relations for infants. Further, mothers tailored their communication to infants' level of lexical-mapping development. Mothers of prelexical infants used target words in synchrony with object motion more often than mothers of early- and advanced-lexical infants. Mothers' decreasing use of synchrony across age parallels infants' decreasing reliance on synchrony, suggesting a dynamical and reciprocal environment–organismic relation. |
|||
|
Member![]() |
Beautiful! Thanks for that! This is interesting: Guess the Artist (compares paintings by 2 elephants, a lowland gorilla, a 9 year old child and 2 professional artists) |
|||
|
Member![]() |
Speaking of speculation on the evolution of language and cognition... re: The Mind of a Tool Maker session at the AAAS in Boston: the bottom line is this: the study and discussion of evolution of cognition and language requires extreme caution, subtlety, rigor, nuance, a high-pass filter for bullshit, and so on and so forth. And, alas, the level of speculation and pure unadulterated paleo-nonsense was off the scale. This session made me appreciate why the French Academy forbade language evolution as a topic. The audience deserved better. My favorite line: the organizer of the workshop, Dr. Lam, in her opening remarks, said that one reason she wanted to have this workshop was because she had such a hard time getting her ideas on evolution of cognition published .... Yikes! |
|||
|
|
Member |
Well, it's not as if any of them have any real clue, eh? And Evolutionism is the reigning faith in Scientism regarding how all aspects of life and cognition came to be. There's also the Playskool version: Legos click. Anyway, In The Beginning was the Focus Group. Everyone knows *that*. P.S. Graci for the Talking Brains blog link. |
|||
|
Member![]() |
Thanks DIT, in a way I feel it´s sad to live in a culture, where you feel need to prove these things... ---------------------------- This sentence will appear every time I post. |
|||
|
Member![]() |
Well, yeah, on the one hand it seems like there should be nothing more natural and obvious in the whole world than the way a mother interacts with her child and teaches the child how to speak. Yet on the other hand, when you step back and look at things in a detached way, it's quite a mind-blowing thing that humans are wired to just instinctively 'know' what to do, and that it works as well as it does. There are so many things that humans do effortlessly that totally leave our best technology in the dust. Like speech, learning, interacting with the real world... Came across a REALLY interesting article: How to grow a super-athelete. Makes me want to start practicing playing my saxophone again... |
|||
|
Member![]() |
Another good reason to study normal development and behaviour is to develop models of therapy for people with developmental problems. There you can't just do what comes naturally, but have to tweak it. Having description of the processes of normal development can provide the inspiration to know which things could be tried repeatedly, or in a simplefied manner, etc.
|
|||
|
Member![]() |
Of course, you´re right both of you. As a speech therapist myself I see the need for these studies all the time, but maybe that´s also the reason why I sometimes wish the effort placed in studies of the abnormal using the normality as a control group instead. We really miss good studies of the efficiency of therapy, especially in Denmark.
Nice article on the myelin, DIT - you just have to remember the myelination isn´t reserved for suitable behavior - the bad habits are myelined as well and that explains the amount of training you need to reverse a mislearned action. ---------------------------- This sentence will appear every time I post. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Hi folks,
Neurophys is a topic of some interest to me as well :] Look what I saw on boingboing: http://www.boingboing.net/2008/05/28/bionic-monkeys-eat.html robotic arms jacked into monkey, monkey uses them to eat. People ask about the ethics of treating the monkey this way. I find myself wondering about the production-hours behind burnished alloy precision manipulators, the bananas, and people eating mud because of food "shortages". This may seem like bananas and oranges, but it seems to me to be all a part of the choice we're confronted with in this new CE21st. "The board is a mirror of the mind of the players as the moments pass. When a master studies the record of a game he can tell at what point greed overtook the pupil, when he became tired, when he fell into stupidity, and when the maid came by with tea." --Anonymous |
|||
|
|
Member |
OCZ NIA BrainComputer Interface
___________________________________________________________ "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." Alan Kay, 1971. |
|||
|
Member![]() |
Pilots of the future may activate decision support aids with their brains rather than their fingers. Like an avionics system, they may communicate with the aircraft electrically via brain signals. Impossible as it sounds, military researchers see this as a distinct possibility.
---------- Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill ??? |
|||
|
|
Member |
From HHMI News
Down with Fearmongering ______________________________________________________________ ...after all you can chuck bones in an envelope -- remotepush "Damn it Jim, I'm a doctor not an animator!" -- Thal ...if it's that small a world, it starts to smell funny -- CayceP |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 ... 16 17 18 19 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

