[knott.from.the.auteur(ial)]
[from.the.actuator]

> How can I get in touch with you?

[u_r_tact.till(authors.ego.soil).ian.stroking]
[pls.rite+bleed.txt.eweual.nes.all.ova.the.l[d]eaden.paper.trail(s).N.corded.wurd.throats]

> What are the titles of all your books? What order do they come in? Do I
> have to read them in that order? What's the best one to read first?

YEARNING.CH.ROME[wasn't built.in.a.daze]
NEURO[tic.ally]MAN[.chaser+all.maven.like]CER
CO[deep.end.encies.in.a.cut/literacy/cusp](sh)UNT.ZERO
MON[dayitishly.colour.drunk+gender.taffy.pulling]A.LISA.OVum.DRIVE

THE.DIFFurred.sheared.static.history.ENGINEs(with.B.ru[bric(kali)e.Sterling)

VuRT.UAL[d.koonish]LIGHT[vs.heavy.wai.tingles, this 1]
IDOling.thRU.pager.states
cA[u]LL.TOMORROW.+n.cased.in.uncertainty.PARTIES

P[(seudo)purrrfectly.paired.functional.narrative]AT.[my]TuRN.RE.COG[ging.via.a.discurse.analysis.defi]NITION


>
> What movies have been made from your novels?

[u_ask_4_an.attempt_@_visual.translation.st[h]itching.of.L/e.ments.designed + coded.else.where?]
[_y?_]

> Is it true there's a movie of NEUROMANCER in the works?

[snap.ditto+re.N.vent(gibsons.actus_reus.spleen)]

> When is your next novel coming out?

[drenched.time.frizzon.plotlines+gestation.breath.on.a.characterised/his.to[r]y/looping]
[it-will_b_co_optically.ire.gurgitative.in.a.sublimity.shawl]
[_weight_+x.pe(d)ri(nk)ence.when.dual.time.pitches.it.2wards.the.reading.public]

> Why haven't you ever toured where I live?

[alan_t(o)uring.would.have.been.proud]

This message has been edited. Last edited by: ][mez][,

Now there's a handle I haven't seen in a while.

_i.come.when.sum[of.my.tenatiff.parts]moned_



--

_coma.stenched.whilst.writers.block.N.dulging_

Who invoked the mez?

Welcome back, lady.

h.e(chos)lloha, md.

warm well.comes appreciated *small.thxful.smiles*.
sum.mo(o)ns.in.the.shape.[shift/control/delete].of.the.txtual.desperate.
when.literary.death.bee.cums_her+him+them_thru.repetition.dr[(g)l]oss, i appear.

n.vok[arr.tiff]erly,
][mez][

[blinks wide eyes]

It's like...it's like...Finnegan's Wake written by Kevin Mitnick with a graduate degree in deconstruction theory.

It's fanfuckingtastic, in other words.

++.Zen.-like.wandering.n.between.transm[utat]i[on]ssions

++.y-t.][orquing][ through .cracker.jacked ][N jilled up][ .air.spaced-out.frames.
++.j.igged.ya][hoo][.com under.g][round][oes re-Furbishment whilst PrEC.c.denSEs Nuke Countries, footballesque soldiers, the .A.ustralian .g.round .f.orce .a.cademizes.
.X-fighters Milk a Parv.o. virus-like ."us".

I dreamt in mezangelle last night.

-.N.ations .V.ictimised & .S.avagery-.Vocalised in Warish-S.ickness
-3848 .M.][usk.co-fights][ breathe & drag .orwe.llian. .n.uance.s. [in .tow.tal].
-Con.f.used. aching .ul.nas, Oratory Punctures & asin.ine. hawk-like WINGS .c.oated in n.di.gestable dust
-.VIA.graed & Hepatic .Dyn.a.mo .Corpses .U.nderwritten via .X.enophobias, .O. bviously.
-.Ti.-died muthas .W.eep & .W.i.S.h for Peace .WI.thout .D.ensity
-.os.ama & .co.dependant .Mary.-mother-of-go][o][dness rape the news
-.Whitewa.shed shel.ter.ed .MOD.e of dealing//new .York.ian .pl. at itudes & .u.l.tra-.onius .m.edia-static
-.William G.ibson r.ates. of existence & .clone.s .BAT.tle .F.uture WANK

quote:

Originally posted by anarchocyclist:
I dreamt in mezangelle last night.

can.i.re.quest.a..unpack.pls?

[+ uberness, here].

http://unhub.com/netwurker

Consistent with the fractured narrative logic of dreams, everything anyone spoke I could "see" with brackets, underscores, slashes, and vertical rules peppering the text. Soon enough we (don't ask who "we" were) were all discussing mezangelle in mezangelle, going over possible interpretations, and the dream-environment was awash in characters.

I don't pretend to read it easily; as a matter of fact, it takes me a while to parse all but the simplest statements, and even then I can only guess at the intended meanings. Of course, intended meaning is not always necessarily important to the viewer/reader's interpretation, and certainly not important to her/his enjoyment.

We're not worthy! We're not worthy!

(but keep posting, nonetheless.)

Yeah, what Pauline said. I forgot to add, in my last post, that the dream was puzzling, convoluted, and incredibly enjoyable.

It does make me wonder what it would be like to talk to mez in "real life" though...

I really want to hear her read. Not sure I have a compatible sound card and/or software, though.

I used to do the net.artist poetry thing. Sometime around when I discovered e.e. cummings and bbs.

I like the graphical/hover/hold element to mez's stuff. For those who haven't, check out her websites.

Thanks for the revised FAQ, madam. Ca me plait.

quote:

Originally posted by Pauline:
We're not worthy! We're not worthy!

(but keep posting, nonetheless.)

*b.link*[2 standard.of.worthiness]?

.summons=action.
.x.press[here.+.nowisms]ion.

quote:

Originally posted by anarchocyclist:
Consistent with the fractured narrative logic of dreams, everything anyone spoke I could "see" with brackets, underscores, slashes, and vertical rules peppering the text. Soon enough we (don't ask who "we" were) were all discussing mezangelle in mezangelle, going over possible interpretations, and the dream-environment was awash in characters.

!!!

*uber-n.teresting_sighs*

quote:

I don't pretend to read it easily; as a matter of fact, it takes me a while to parse all but the simplest statements, and even then I can only guess at the intended meanings. Of course, intended meaning is not always necessarily important to the viewer/reader's interpretation, and certainly not important to her/his enjoyment.

spot.on[+regulated/man(out)dated.comprehension._off_]

[u.make.of.it.wot.u.wi[ther]ll]

[play+curi(m)ouser+c(at)urioser.is.my.n.ducement.aim]